0day streak
Context-dependent
Social
Law of Triviality
Decision-making principleDefinition
Groups may spend excessive time discussing simple minor issues while giving too little attention to complex important ones.
Why it happens
Complex decisions require expertise and create uncertainty. Simple topics are easier to understand, safer to discuss and offer more opportunities for visible participation.
Real-life examples
- A team quickly approves a major architecture decision but debates button colours for an hour.
- A budget meeting spends more time discussing office snacks than expensive infrastructure.
- A committee gives little attention to security risks but argues extensively about presentation formatting.
- A planning session focuses on naming a feature instead of validating whether users need it.
How to counter it
- Allocate discussion time according to importance and risk.
- Send simple decisions asynchronously.
- Define decision owners and required expertise.
- Start meetings with the highest-impact questions.
Quick tips
- Ask: 'Is discussion time proportional to impact?'
- Time-box minor decisions.
- Address complex risks first.
- Assign an accountable decision owner.
Sources and further reading
- Parkinson's Law, or The Pursuit of Progress
John Murray (London) · accessed 2025-12-01