Skip to main content
0day streak
Supported

Logical & Reasoning

Conjunction Fallacy

Social-cognitive bias

Definition

The tendency to believe that a combination of specific conditions is more probable than a single general one.

Why it happens

Detailed, specific scenarios feel more plausible because they create a vivid narrative. We confuse a good story with high probability.

Real-life examples

  • Thinking 'Linda is a bank teller and a feminist' is more likely than 'Linda is a bank teller' after hearing she studied philosophy.
  • Believing a specific, detailed prediction over a vague one, even though the specific one is mathematically less likely.
  • Expecting a complex chain of events over a simpler but more probable explanation.

How to counter it

  1. Remember: adding conditions always reduces or maintains probability.
  2. Be skeptical of detailed scenarios that feel more "realistic."
  3. Practice basic probability reasoning with simple examples.
  4. Ask: "Is this less likely simply because it's more specific?"

Quick tips

  • Remember: adding conditions always reduces (or maintains) probability, never increases it.
  • Be skeptical of scenarios that are compelling because they're detailed.
  • Practice basic probability reasoning.
  • Ask: 'Is this less likely simply because it's more specific?'

Sources and further reading