0day streak
Supported
Logical & Reasoning
Conjunction Fallacy
Social-cognitive biasDefinition
The tendency to believe that a combination of specific conditions is more probable than a single general one.
Why it happens
Detailed, specific scenarios feel more plausible because they create a vivid narrative. We confuse a good story with high probability.
Real-life examples
- Thinking 'Linda is a bank teller and a feminist' is more likely than 'Linda is a bank teller' after hearing she studied philosophy.
- Believing a specific, detailed prediction over a vague one, even though the specific one is mathematically less likely.
- Expecting a complex chain of events over a simpler but more probable explanation.
How to counter it
- Remember: adding conditions always reduces or maintains probability.
- Be skeptical of detailed scenarios that feel more "realistic."
- Practice basic probability reasoning with simple examples.
- Ask: "Is this less likely simply because it's more specific?"
Quick tips
- Remember: adding conditions always reduces (or maintains) probability, never increases it.
- Be skeptical of scenarios that are compelling because they're detailed.
- Practice basic probability reasoning.
- Ask: 'Is this less likely simply because it's more specific?'
Sources and further reading
- Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment
Psychological Review · accessed 2025-12-01